When writing your KAM annotated Bioliographies for your Depth section comment on: --- Background Research --- 1. Background research - well researched because ... 2. Background research - historical legacy 3. Background research - relevant research articles 4. Background research - built upon well 5. Background research - faults --- Writing --- 6. Writing - easy to comprehend 7. Writing - formulas well explained 8. Writing - use of graphs 9. Writing - use of pictures were ... 10. Writing - sentence structure was ... 11. Writing - word choice was ... 12. Writing - overall writing style 13. Writing - faults were ... --- Organization --- 14. Organization - opening, conclusion 15. Organization - meaningful organization 16. Organization - improved comprehension 17. Organization - could be improved by... --- Research --- 18. Research - design 19. Research - methodology 20. Research - analysis 11. Research - simulation 12. Research - analysis 13. Research - flaws were ... 14. Research - expand on ... 15. Research - did a good job with ... 16. Research - easy to understand because ... 17. Research - hard to understand because ... 18. Research - is relevant to my KAM because ... 19. Research - will help my KAM because ... 30. Research - opens other areas of research on ... 31. Research - methodology flaws or strengths were ... 32. Research - sparks ideas for my KAM on ... --- Problem Statement --- 33. Problem - the problem formulation was ... 34. Problem - the problem was meaningful because ... 35. Problem - the problem was important for this KAM because ... 36. Problem - the problem was well phrased because... 37. Problem - the problem could have been ... 38. Problem - a better problem statement would have been ... 39. Problem - the prob statement was throughtful because ... --- Introduction --- 40. Introduction - the introduction was thorough 41. Introduction - the introduction missed ... 42. Introduction - the introduction could have been improved if... 43. Introduction - the introduction was well written because ... 44. Introduction - the introduction would have done (so and so) ... 45. Conclusion (see Intro 40-44) 46. Body (see Intro 40-44) 47. Acknowledgements - authors acknowledged ... 48. Shortcomings - what were they? 49. Relevance - why was this article important to your KAM? 50. Future directions - what other research does this article open up? Create your own list, go down the checklist and you'll never be at a loss for what to write about! Good luck -Ben